Showing posts with label George Pataki. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Pataki. Show all posts

Monday, February 22, 2010

Will Barclay Wants to be a Looney Tune?

As Buggs Buddy I think I am in the best position to say this: State Assemblyman William Barclay’s knee-jerk reactions and absurd press releases are making him look like Wile E. Coyote trying to chase down the one he will never catch, Doug Hoffman, the one who looks more and more like the Road Runner speeding to victory in NY-23.

Tonight Barclay became the newest looney tune running for federal office when he issued an attack on Doug Hoffman. Barclay’s expensive new media consultant, rumored to be former unknown Congressman Fred J. Eckert of Eagle Communications, e-mailed the statement tonight at 8:16 pm to multiple news outlets.

In the release Barclay reveals his desperation by “urging” Doug Hoffman to renounce the idea of Ron Paul running for President in 2012. Not that Hoffman has any connection to the idea after having been endorsed by several other potential 2012 presidential hopefuls including: Governor George Pataki, Governor Sarah Palin, Senator Fred Thompson, Congressman Mike Pence, Governor Tim Pawlenty and others, but it is kind of silly to read Barclay’s disunity rant.

If you read between the lines of everything that Barclay sends out (the stuff that comes in complete sentences at least) all you find is negativity and knee-jerk reactions. It’s the kind of stuff that fills the Assembly Chamber in Albany where Barclay was infected with this vitriolic incumbent disease I like to call “Albany insider-osis.”

The positive press attention Doug Hoffman received from the Syracuse paper, National Review Online, several prominent Republican bloggers and the Washington Times, has clearly demoralized the Barclay camp. But to Barclay’s credit at least he realizes the need to do something to shake up this race quickly. He can only get away with being the guy who lost Republican control of the State Senate, to Darrel Aubertine, for so long without losing people’s attention.

However, the fact that Barclay chose to attack Ron Paul instead of (oh… I don’t know) Bill Owens or Barack Obama speaks volumes about what kind of Republican he is – a Republican of disunity, a looney tune Republican. Barclay’s attacks are a function of four key things that all voters should consider.

First, Barclay is consumed with the idea of purging Republicans instead of beating the Democrats in 2010. What Barclay doesn’t understand is that his recent call for a unity pledge in NY-23 was completely undermined when his next move was to call for a purge of any fellow Republican who he disagrees with on one particular issue. In this case it is Ron Paul’s opposition to the War in Iraq. Next week it will be his opposition to Tim Pawlenty’s position of being pro-life. The week after that it will be something else absurd. The real question is: why does Barclay want to make the GOP smaller instead of uniting Republicans of all stripes behind a common goal like winning back the House in 2010?

Second, Barclay’s focus on the 2012 presidential elections shows his priorities are in the wrong place. He should be focused on winning in 2010 and bringing prosperity and economic growth back to NY-23. Barclay’s attacks are a distraction from his lack of solutions and focus on what people really care about today: better jobs, lower taxes, less spending, more credit, improved education and market-based solutions to health care.

Third, Barclay’s attacks are a sign of desperation. Doug Hoffman has the lead on money raised, grassroots support, national endorsements, online media, local press, an organized campaign team and about every other metric that could possibly be used to judge a candidates viability in a Republican primary.

Finally, Barclay’s release was absurd on its face. To insinuate that Doug Hoffman is weak on terrorism is pretty lame. After all, Barclay never spent any time in the military. Hoffman has. Hoffman’s campaign website is clear on this issue.

“We are past the point of pointing fingers over how we got to where we are in Iraq and Afghanistan. The question for us now is where do we go from here? I believe we must continue to try and turn the security and governing of Iraq over to the Iraqis. I also believe we need to continue to go after the terrorist strongholds and training bases wherever they are located. The war against terror is not over and the terrorists’ goal remains the destruction of the United States and our way of life. We must never forget this fact.”

Hoffman understands the threats we face and is committed to being a strong defender of American interests. Unlike Barclay, Hoffman was never fed by a silver spoon and he wasn’t an heir to political power like Barclay was from his father’s hard effort. Unlike Barclay, Hoffman had to make something of himself. And Hoffman is the only candidate who has military experience. That is something that military families in Fort Drum will recognize and it is an insult that Barclay would attack a veteran with such vitriol.

Barclay should apologize for throwing other people under the bus to further his own political future. Barclay does not have a campaign that can win. It could have been, but it is evolving into a campaign in desperation mode, running out of fuel. And for that reason we are moving him back to the third tier of candidates with the rest of the other looney tunes.

Monday, January 18, 2010

How a Scott Brown Victory on Tuesday Might Affect NY Politics

Consider the fact that Massachusetts is as blue a state as they come, bluer than New York I would argue. If Scott Brown wins tomorrow against Martha Coakley I think it is a victory for a few people here in New York, and it could set off a chain reaction across the state (and the country).

First, I think a Brown victory forces George Pataki to take a second look at a US Senate run against Gillibrand/Ford. A new Sienna Poll out today shows Pataki beating Gillibrand handily 51% to 38%. If Pataki gets into the race I think Harold Ford has a better shot at winning the Democratic primary. He has pushed one talking point and one talking point only the last two weeks -- that he is an independent Democrat who will not be beholden to anybody else but the people of New York. That message will soon resonate with Democratic primary voters if Scott Brown pulls out a victory.

I would also venture to say that a Scott Brown victory helps Doug Hoffman in NY-23 since both of their candidacies have drawn similar parallels in the media and have been compared extensively. The key difference between Brown and Hoffman is that Brown is running on a major party line in 2010 which gives him the support of both moderate and conservative Republicans alike. In 2009 Hoffman did not have that advantage, and thus he had to reach out to the far right and outside national interest groups for help. Brown has national interests playing a role in his campaign as well, but they are not as prominent as they were in the NY-23 special election last year. At the end of the day though I think a Brown victory helps Hoffman in NY-23 should he decide to run.

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Just Speculation on Molinari

I'm no expert, but I am going out on a limb to say that I don't think many Republicans will take the news, that former Republican Representative Susan Molinari is considering running for US Senate, very seriously. She works in Virginia for Rudy Giuliani's law firm, but hasn't held elective office since the mid-90s. It was also strange that she said she would invoke the leadership of US Senator Charles Schumer in her first pitch to run for US Senate (as a Republican?).

But the weirdest things about Molinari's "testing the waters press" today is that she sent her own father, Guy Molinari, out to pimp for her candidacy. Guy, a former congressman and Susan's father was quoted saying, "All of a sudden I think, the best candidate in the entire country is my daughter." Then he bragged to Ed Cox, the GOP State Chairman, on her.

I am sure people had to read this news and wonder: just who in the world comes up with this stuff? My first thought was that maybe Molinari should run for Governor with Dede Scozzafava on her ticket for LG.

George Pataki must really not be interested in running though because it just doesn't make sense for Congressman Peter King to put himself back into the picture or for Molinari to even think about US Senate.