Monday, February 8, 2010

Dede Scozzafava’s Gay Pride Agenda

In an effort to use her national notoriety to further damage the Republican brand, Assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava has begun yet another crusade for change. It wasn’t enough for Scozzafava that the voters of NY-23 rejected her to be the Republican nominee for Congress last year. She wants the media spotlight back on her, and if history tells us anything it is that Dede will become, yet again, the focus of the mainstream media’s adulation (and ours).

Today it was reported in the Watertown Daily Times that Scozzafava will be the keynote speaker at a gay rights rally being held at SUNY Potsdam, sponsored by the Standing on the Side of Love campaign. The college’s Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered Association (LGBTA) is helping to organize it. But don’t let the name fool you – LGBT may sound like a yummy sandwich, but their tactics are right out of the textbook of Michael Moore – make blanket generalizations and accusations about our country’s intolerance and bigotry to promote an extremist political agenda.

Here is some advice for Scozzafava as she prepares for her talk this week to the LGBT group. First, your call to action must go beyond President Barack Obama’s. Our President believes that marriage should be between a man and a woman – you need to go further to the left than the President who voted on June 7th of 2006 against a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.

Second, on the issue of “don’t ask, don’t tell” you need to make yourself clear that the gay community is in favor of punishing military leaders if they try to discourage men from dressing in drag as they go into the foxholes of the battlefields in Iraq and Afghanistan as they fight radical Islamic terrorists.

Third, you need to oppose any attempt by the citizens to vote for this issue by referendum because we know that in almost every instance when the issue of gay marriage comes before the voters they are against it and the measure fails. In the year 2010, we cannot allow democracy to rule the day. The voters should not be given the choice to continue policies that so blatantly discriminate against men who leave their wives for other men and women who love other women, or transgendered persons. If you make a clear statement in opposition of allowing voters to decide for themselves on the issue of redefining marriage then we will know how pink your swastika really is.

Fourth, those in the homosexual movement do not want to leave out our brothers and sisters who have had sex changes. Don’t exclude the transsexuals and she-men. Make a clear statement – that these people should receive support from the federal government to pay for their sex changes and breast augmentations so that we do not hurt the transgendered people’s feelings or show our intolerance. They have every right to the same quality of health care as the rest of our citizens.

Finally, to build a credible rainbow coalition you need to be on the frontlines of promoting tolerance in our schools for LGBT people. We need to support groups like the North American Association of Men and Boys Love Association (NAMBLA), that seeks to promote the legalization of sex with young boys by older men. In addition, we should promote the queer agenda in schools throughout the country. If we aren’t willing to teach the same-sex marriage agenda to our children in public schools, then we aren’t really telling the truth about homosexuality to the next generation. Not teaching same-sex marriage in our schools would be like ignoring the history of slavery in our country.

If you care about the values of America you will follow through on these points. But if you can’t commit to these basic principles based on justice and equality then you have no place to lecture us about equal rights and human rights for all people. Is your swastika for gay marriage pinker than your infamous jacket? Only you can fight the lies and the bigotry of proponents of traditional marriage between one man and one woman.

Valentine's Day is coming quickly! Show your love and teach your children it is okay to come out of the closet because Dede says so.

62 comments:

  1. And Matt Doheny gave this woman $2,400 to run for Congress (as a Republican)?

    ReplyDelete
  2. * Re: Your advice to Dede in your point #2:

    .. Second, on the issue of “don’t ask, don’t tell” you need to make yourself clear that the gay community is in favor of punishing military leaders if they try to discourage men from dressing in drag as they go into the foxholes of the battlefields in Iraq and Afghanistan as they fight radical Islamic terrorists."

    You need to right now offer an apology to everyone in uniform or who has ever served in uniform who is/or was gay and no one knew about it at the time, and to the families of any gay servicemember who was gay and died in combat or in the service of our country.

    You are a shameless, nasty little insect - no wonder you are a biased GOP-Rightwingnut case.

    Bugs Nutty.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pretty hard-hitting piece. My opinion is that Dede is bringing this on herself though. To be the mouth piece of these radical fringe issues when our focus should be on the economy and jobs brings this kind of negative attention.

    And as for 10:14 you must be kidding. Buggs is point out the satire in the politics of "don't ask, don't tell." What do we do institutionally with openly gay members of the military? Do we provide separate housing? Do we allow different dress codes? How would it affect recruiting and retention of the services? There are a lot of practical issues changing the policy requires, to go along with the emotional and religious issues.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Doheny supported Dede? That's news to me...

    ReplyDelete
  6. Not only did he support her... he was in the paper bragging about how wonderful she was when she won the county chairs over.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 958 - I'd like to see a link to that report. Thanks for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dear writer of "Whatsupny23":

    You're a douche.

    Condemning all gays and lesbians and making associated slurs and remarks just shows how uneducated and how remarkably intolerant you are.

    1) Gay Marriage: it's equality for what's considered the minority; look it up, it's happened in the past with "minorities" as supposedly, everyone in this country deserves the same rights.

    2) Don't Ask, Don't Tell: The people in the armed forces are there to do a job, gay or straight. There are already gays in the military, plenty of them in fact - so get over it. Repealing this act would allow them to not feel pressured about being "caught" being themselves for simply acknowledging "I'm gay" or having a gay relationship.

    3) Most often than not, people are swayed by how much money is thrown in their faces, not on what they really feel or what research they themselves conduct. Even if a majority of people didn't want gay marriage, so what? It doesn't affect anybody who doesn't want to be in one. If the majority of voters in the US wanted to kill any person over the age of 60 to improve the economy, does that mean it should happen because those over 60 represent a sect of life that we don't want to associate with? No.

    4) You obviously know nothing about transgendered people. Meet a couple and see what they've gone through - just because you can't associate with being homosexual or because you can't associate with being "born into the wrong gender" doesn't mean it's something you have to fight against.

    5) The media link you referenced is biased, but regardless there are two sides to the coin. Would you rather kids go ahead and have sex, (straight or gay sex) without protection, or to have it? If the kids are going to have sex, I'd rather them have protection. Sure, it's a risk giving them condoms and such because then the kids might think it was okay to have sex - but then again, maybe they already do and wouldn't use protection in the first place.

    I think a few of the items involved are beyond the typical "safety" lines but I'm not in the health department - so maybe those additional items provide for safer sex for those who engage in it.

    As for the NAMBLA, all "societies" have their organizations which are on a different moral level. Do I encourage this organization? No. Do I think they're right? No. I don't think the KKK is a good organization either but you wouldn't believe the amount of people still involved with that either. Not all gay-related organizations are ones I'd agree with, but the same goes for all organizations in general.

    Children grow up mimicking what they see around them - adults, and in the mass, traditional families, however as the children continue to become independent and act on their own beliefs they need to realize that it's okay for them to be who they are and love who they choose to love. Just because it doesn't follow the tradition doesn't mean it's wrong; it's not hurting anybody and it's not hurting the children or adults themselves. The only thing that's hurting them are homophobic people like you, using stereotypes, slurs, violence, bullying, propaganda, religion and anything else you can fester up to prove to them that you're the elite and therefore you are right, claiming superiority over any being that dares challenge what you deem the right way to live.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This post is spot on. The twisting of traditional morals and the decay of the traditional family will be the downfall of the US, just as it was for the Greeks and the Romans and all other previous world powers. Those who do not learn from history's mistakes are doomed to repeat them.

    ReplyDelete
  10. George W. Bush's attorney wrote an excellent piece in the January 18th issue of Newsweek. He is a conservative who is arguing for marriage equality. Dick Cheney is for marriage equality...Why not attack him? Marriage is a contract in the eyes of the law...also, for many people it is a religious covenant and people should respect that as well. The bill in the state legislature provided for equal treatment but did NOT force any religious institution to sanction or perform anything against its beliefs. Dede was asked to speak at SUNY Potsdam and she agreed. She has more courage to stand up for her convictions in the face of such bigotry than most people in public office.

    ReplyDelete
  11. if a man and woman marriage is so great why is there so much domestic violence and child abuse in this world?

    ReplyDelete
  12. I like the democracy part... where the author considers whether people should be allowed to vote for themselves on this. I mean think about it. The minority who want gay marriage would be imposing their wishes onto the majority of the people in this instance. How's that for one person, one vote? It sounds more like a radical social experiment to me. We have had marriage between one man and one woman for hundreds of years without any big problems. Now in the middle of a difficult recession and high unemployment we want to go back to a debate that divides Americans? How about we deal with jobs and the economy before we go off on this gay rights path?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Why don't you attack adultery with the same vigor? Some of the most conservative "family values" elected officials enjoy adulterous relationships . What HYPOCRISY!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. 1150 - if America is so bad why don't you leave it?

    ReplyDelete
  15. 1152 - Ahhh yes... change the subject as quickly as possible to heterosexual relationships because you just lost the gay marriage argument and you need to pull people's attention to something else. Buggs never made the claim that traditional relationships were perfect. That point is obvious. What Buggs is saying is that maybe it isn't the best thing in the world to have openly gay men and women in the military during 2 wars. Maybe we shouldn't be teaching children in grade school and high school that same-sex marriage is a good thing. Maybe we should allow people the right to vote on this issue. Nah - let the politicians decide because they always know what is best for us.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Why shouldn't gays have rights, we let all the non americans have their way with all of our policies, in fact they have more rights than american born people have and they don't even have to work for them we gave them anything they wanted

    ReplyDelete
  17. Why don't you approach adultery with the same vigor? There are many conservative "family values" elected officials in relationships outside of marriage.Some are honored by the Conservative Party or featured in The New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedom publications. What hypocrisy!!!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Courage? You call that courage? Lately, the media has made it status quo to be for homosexual marriage as they have painstakingly assaulted anyone who believes otherwise by attacking them and calling them homophobes. It is not a courageous trait to stand up in front of a group who agrees with you and profess to them the beliefs they already possess. What would be courageous is for her to do this at an event where she would knowingly get challenged. So let's get it straight. She is not courageous. Furthermore, she and Janet Duprey will use this now as a liberal facet of their democratic agendas while still professing to be republicans. I say it is time they came out of the closet...they are RINOs. Should they decide to declare their liberal roots and switch parties, now that might be courageous.

    ReplyDelete
  19. 11:59 - Why don't you ask Bill Clinton about adultery?

    Or maybe John Edwards?

    Remember him? He was the Democratic Party's Vice Presidential nominee in 2004 and for almost all of 2009 denied to his wife that he was a father to a secret love child. What hypocrisy!!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. 12:03 Does that apply to Dick Cheney and George W. Bush's attorney as well or just women that support that particular issue??

    ReplyDelete
  21. Adultery, you say?

    Do you mean like Democratic Governor Elliot Spitzer and Democratic Governor David Paterson?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Fear of gays is interesting ... it's like the straights fear them for what reason? That a gay person might approach them? I doubt it, but if they did, ask why? And, would you approach them?

    The argument is weak, very weak indeed. Gays want to live their own life, so what - don't you?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Scozzfava- what a joke

    ReplyDelete
  24. What Blix said, especially the part that said "You're a douche."

    Gay marriage should never be put to a vote by the public. Civil rights is not a majority rules issue. The majority on this issue, in this country, consists of narrow minded, intolerant, ignorant and/or hypocritical people. By no means do they have the right to oppress the minority, just because they think they can.

    It does take courage for Dede to do this, as she had to know there would be people out there waiting to condemn her, like this douche.

    ReplyDelete
  25. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Amazing that such a detailed analysis and dissection can be made to a keynote speech that hasn't even transpired yet. Wow. Gotta hand it to the right-wingers on this. Since you've mastered the science of time travel, maybe you should try it going backwards as well and fix the economic mess you guys left us.

    ReplyDelete
  27. The "sanctity of marriage" argument that so many use against allowing gay marriage is a joke. As long as straights are allowed to divorce & remarry as many times as they like, it's pretty ridiculous to use that line.

    ReplyDelete
  28. The President opposes gay marriage, but supports civil unions. Obama does not believe that marriage is a human right. However, he does believe that non-discrimination is a human right. Look at his record.

    http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Barack_Obama_Civil_Rights.htm#Gay_Rights

    ReplyDelete
  29. Who knew a post on Dede Scozzafava and gay marriage would elicit so many comments?

    ReplyDelete
  30. It took a while but atleast we finally got to a "Since you've mastered the science of time travel, maybe you should try it going backwards as well and fix the economic mess you guys left us." comment. It is all George Bush's fault.

    ReplyDelete
  31. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  32. You ignorance is evident. Before you waste your time with such nonsense, you may find it helpful to conduct some actual research.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Yes, there are several postings for support of the gay rights and the like. However, no one wants to identify themselves supporting this agenda they so strongly advocate. Very, very odd... Mark Bently, Watertown, NY.

    ReplyDelete
  34. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  35. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  36. "You ignorance is evident. Before you waste your time with such nonsense, you may find it helpful to conduct some actual research." To Mark Bently, I tried to post my name, instead was put as Anonymous, however, here ya go...Doug Hamilton, Massena, NY.

    ReplyDelete
  37. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Wow, seriously? YOU are what is wrong with America.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Dede does not have an AGENDA on this issue. That is a loaded headline and beneath the province of respected journalism. I suppose then that Palin has a SECESSION AGENDA after her words at the tea party meeting in Texas..

    ReplyDelete
  40. Does Dick Cheney have a Gay/ Lesbian Agenda with his stance on the subject to protect his daughter? So it would seem. That makes Cheney and Dede Scozzafava a couple of Rhinos.

    ReplyDelete
  41. The GOP-Rightwingnuts want their brand of anti-gay legislation all across the country (one man and one woman), that is until of course, it impacts one of their own (their family member or someone they know and "like")... or when they toe-tap in a men's toilet in, eh Sen. Craig, or chase a House page, right Rep. Foley, or be the daughter of Deadeye Dick -- what a joke the GOP is on this issue...

    And, that doesn't even count divorce rates -- what is the divorce rate among gays, I wonder?

    Newt has what: 3 to date...

    ReplyDelete
  42. GOP Right wing nut mouthpiece Rush Limbaugh has three divorces and counting. It is all about " family" values don't you know.

    ReplyDelete
  43. If Dick Cheney is for gay marriage then I am against it.

    Because as a Democrat I am against anything Cheney is for!!!

    ReplyDelete
  44. Can someone please start a DRAFT DAN FRANCIS website? He is our man to lead us into the 2010 elections. He should run for Congress, or Senate, or even President. I'd vote for him!

    ReplyDelete
  45. Glenn Beck , the noted homophobe talk show icon to conservatives, likes marraige between a man and a woman so much he has done it twice and fathered six children between the two wives. He is a good Mormon.
    What do conservatives have agianst individual freedom? If you don't believe i abortion; then don't get one. If you do not believe in Gay marriage; then don't do it. And if someone does not believe that a man made doctrine , revised by men and interpreted by men ( that would be the Bible or any religious script) is what you do not buy in to, then don't make laws based on them. It is as simple as that.
    How about if you cannot help your fellow man, then have the decency to leave him alone.

    ReplyDelete
  46. how about no laws at all. how's that for individual freedom. that is basically what 9:10 is suggesting. Absurd.

    ReplyDelete
  47. The liberals best argument for gay marriage is to call opponents homophobes. That sounds about par for the course for liberals though.

    ReplyDelete
  48. How about a law for everything we do, or think or believe in? Especially regarding personal decisions. That is what 9:42 is suggesting Absurd, and very un American. All of our founding Fathers were Liberals and Progressives, they must be shedding tears to think the Tyrants are now trying to destroy the Great Republic from the inside...

    ReplyDelete
  49. A Conservatives best argument for restricting personal freedoms is always to say " Because the Bible tells us so." About par for the course when rational thought does not defend your choice..

    ReplyDelete
  50. Would all the Christians and Conservatives and Muslims and all the other idealogues please stop telling everybody how to live and what to believe in. This whole gay rights debate is not about murder or some other felony. Get a life, would you and tend to your own back yard.
    Who really cares if they live together or get married and live under the same civil laws as everybody else? Only a meddling, self righeous, control freak who is not all that happy with their own live would even care. It is no harm to you, so just move on..

    ReplyDelete
  51. No idea how I ended up reading this........I'm so proud of Dede. She is a woman who has the nerve to stand up for human rights. A class act. I'll be there on Friday.

    ReplyDelete
  52. It seems the people who hate the thought of gay marriage the most are the ones that struggle with their own sexuality. Maybe it is like prohibition, if we just ban it then we won't drink.
    Republican Senator Larry Craig was a strong voice against it, then he is found making homosexual advances in a Minnesota bathroom. The leading Evangelical pastor Ted Haggard preaches for years against it as a "sin" then is caught and admits to soliciting male prostitutes. Rep. Foley and his young boys and on and on.
    Why is it that people who are secure in themselves and their sexuality have no problem with it? There is a definite pattern here. It just happens too often to ignore.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Homesexualality is a perversion of nature and has helped lead to the downfall of more then one civilization.

    ReplyDelete
  54. To Boone 315 - If you are refering to Sodom and Gomorrah then find someone who can read Greek & Hebrew. If listen to what the Bible actually says and thought about it in the context of the times it was written in you would undoubtedly see that the story is about hospitality - not sexual orientation. Lust for money and power is almost always the downfall of nations. That's what we should be talking about - corporate and political lust. Hmmm, does anyone have pictures?

    ReplyDelete
  55. I believe what you have writen is your own opinion and not that of every other person in our society...We as people have the right to be who we want to be and go into life searching for our own happiness like erevy other american...If we are to live by your standards then we would be living in a society that would tell us what to do,when to do it and how to do it..I was born to parents that taught me to be me and that I was free to do what I wanted to be happy in life and make something for myself and the people around me..To make it simple we need to get back to the constitution and bill of rights and remember that everyone has fought and died for freedom as AMERICANS...

    ReplyDelete
  56. Boone 5:24 a.m.

    That is a direct quote from a Ted Haggard sermon. What are you trying to say?

    ReplyDelete
  57. 6:13 Mary Matalin did not take her husband's name...hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

    ReplyDelete
  58. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  59. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Anon: 4:19

    Yes, the Military has homosexuals. Always has. I would like to thank them and all the brave man and women who serve our country. They also serve as Pastors and Ministers and Religious leaders of Christian sects and as leaders of the right. Larry craig , a revered member of the militant homosexual Right also served his Country in public office. Hats off to all of them..

    ReplyDelete
  61. It would be interesting to know the politcal stand on this issue from the Log Cabin Republicans ( The National Gay and Lesbian Grass Roots Organization).

    ReplyDelete